Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 vs OpenAI: o3

OpenAI: o3 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.5OpenAI: o3Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K200KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$2.00🏆 OpenAI: o3
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$25.00$8.00🏆 OpenAI: o3
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 better than OpenAI: o3?

OpenAI: o3 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 and OpenAI: o3?

Input: $5.00 vs $2.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $25.00 vs $8.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 and OpenAI: o3 support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 supports up to 200K tokens. OpenAI: o3 supports up to 200K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 and OpenAI: o3 support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5: yes. OpenAI: o3: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 with other models

Compare OpenAI: o3 with other models