Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 vs OpenAI: o3 Mini High

OpenAI: o3 Mini High wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.1OpenAI: o3 Mini HighWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K200KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$15.00$1.10🏆 OpenAI: o3 Mini High
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$75.00$4.40🏆 OpenAI: o3 Mini High
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 better than OpenAI: o3 Mini High?

OpenAI: o3 Mini High wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 and OpenAI: o3 Mini High?

Input: $15.00 vs $1.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $75.00 vs $4.40 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 and OpenAI: o3 Mini High support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 supports up to 200K tokens. OpenAI: o3 Mini High supports up to 200K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 and OpenAI: o3 Mini High support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1: yes. OpenAI: o3 Mini High: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 with other models

Compare OpenAI: o3 Mini High with other models