Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Google: Gemma 4 31B wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.1Google: Gemma 4 31BWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K262K🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$15.00$0.10🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$75.00$0.34🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 better than Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Google: Gemma 4 31B wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 and Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Input: $15.00 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $75.00 vs $0.34 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 and Google: Gemma 4 31B support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 supports up to 200K tokens. Google: Gemma 4 31B supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 and Google: Gemma 4 31B support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1: yes. Google: Gemma 4 31B: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 with other models

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B with other models