Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is the pick when you need to fit long inputs in one request, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL when cost matters at scale.
| Spec | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | inclusionAI |
| Input price (per 1M tokens) | $0.05 | $0.06 |
| Output price (per 1M tokens) | $0.25 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1 input/output) | $0.10 | $0.09 |
| Cheaper than … of all models we track | 81% | 82% |
| Context window | 1M tokens (~1,500 pages) | 131K tokens (~197 pages) |
| Larger context than … of all models | 68% | 22% |
| Max output per response | 128K tokens (~96,000 words) | 33K tokens (~24,600 words) |
| Input types | text, image, file | text, image, video |
| Output types | text | text |
| Free variant | No | Yes |
| Listed since | 2026-10-07 | 2026-09-10 |
Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.
| Workload (per month) | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer-support chatbot 50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens) | $8.75 | $8.10 | inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $0.65 |
| RAG search over documents 20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens) | $8.50 | $9.00 | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) saves $0.50 |
| Coding / tool-using agent 2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens) | $9.00 | $9.36 | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) saves $0.36 |
| Batch summarisation 10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens) | $5.50 | $5.88 | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) saves $0.38 |
| Long-document analysis 500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens) | $2.75 | $3.18 | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) saves $0.43 |
| Capability | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL | What it lets you do |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool / function calling | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | call your APIs and run agent loops |
| Structured output (JSON schema) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | return JSON that validates against your schema |
| Reasoning / thinking mode | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems |
| Image input | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | read screenshots, charts and scanned pages |
| Audio input | — | — | take speech or audio directly |
| File / PDF input | ✓ Yes | — | accept documents without your own parsing step |
| Image output | — | — | generate images, not just text |
| Built-in web search | ✓ Yes | — | answer from live web results |
| Seed (reproducible sampling) | — | ✓ Yes | repeat a generation for tests and evals |
| Log-probabilities | — | — | read token confidence for classification and scoring |
From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.
| Date | Model | Input / 1M | Output / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL | $0.06 | $0.18 |
| 2026-09-26 | inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL | $0.02 | $0.06 |
Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is the pick when you need to fit long inputs in one request, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL when cost matters at scale. In short: Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) when you need to fit long inputs in one request, you need file / PDF input, you need built-in web search, you generate long outputs in one go; inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL when cost matters at scale, you need seed (reproducible sampling), you want to prototype at zero cost.
inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is cheaper: $0.09 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 10% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $8.10 against $8.75.
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) costs $0.05 per 1M input tokens and $0.25 per 1M output tokens; inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.06 input and $0.18 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch): 1M tokens, about 1,500 pages, against 131K (about 197 pages) for inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL.
Tool calling — Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch): yes, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL: yes. JSON-schema structured output — Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch): yes, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL: yes.
Yes, both accept image input.
inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL has a free variant (inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-vl:free). Free variants usually carry tighter rate limits.
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) can write up to 128K tokens (about 96,000 words) per response; inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL up to 33K (about 24,600 words).
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) was listed on 2026-10-07; inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL on 2026-09-10.
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch): price unchanged since we started tracking it on 2026-10-08. inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL: input price raised 65% ($0.02 → $0.06/1M), output price raised 66% ($0.06 → $0.18/1M) on 2026-10-14 (2 price changes since 2026-09-12).
Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...
Full Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) specs →Ling 3.0 Flash VL builds on Ling 3.0 Flash (124B total / 5.5B active MoE from InclusionAI), further strengthening its language capabilities while adding native visual perception and advanced visual...
Full inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL specs →