Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.6

Z.ai: GLM 4.6 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5Z.ai: GLM 4.6Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K205K🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.6
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$1.00$0.50🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.6
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$2.00🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.6
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Z.ai: GLM 4.6?

Z.ai: GLM 4.6 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6?

Input: $1.00 vs $0.50 per 1M tokens. Output: $5.00 vs $2.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 support?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports up to 200K tokens. Z.ai: GLM 4.6 supports up to 205K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5: yes. Z.ai: GLM 4.6: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4.6 with other models