Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K256K🏆 SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$1.00$1.00Tie
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$2.00🏆 SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 better than SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1?

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1?

Input: $1.00 vs $1.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $5.00 vs $2.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 support?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports up to 200K tokens. SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 supports up to 256K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5: yes. SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 with other models

Compare SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 with other models