Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K16K🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$1.00$3.00🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$4.00🏆 OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 better than OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?

Input: $1.00 vs $3.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $5.00 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k support?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports up to 200K tokens. OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k supports up to 16K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5: yes. OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 with other models

Compare OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k with other models