Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemma 2 27B

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5Google: Gemma 2 27BWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K8K🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$1.00$0.65🏆 Google: Gemma 2 27B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$0.65🏆 Google: Gemma 2 27B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Google: Gemma 2 27B?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google: Gemma 2 27B?

Input: $1.00 vs $0.65 per 1M tokens. Output: $5.00 vs $0.65 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google: Gemma 2 27B support?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports up to 200K tokens. Google: Gemma 2 27B supports up to 8K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google: Gemma 2 27B support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5: yes. Google: Gemma 2 27B: not advertised.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 with other models

Compare Google: Gemma 2 27B with other models