Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek: R1

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek: R1 are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek: R1Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K64K🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$1.00$0.70🏆 DeepSeek: R1
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$2.50🏆 DeepSeek: R1
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 better than DeepSeek: R1?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek: R1 are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek: R1?

Input: $1.00 vs $0.70 per 1M tokens. Output: $5.00 vs $2.50 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek: R1 support?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports up to 200K tokens. DeepSeek: R1 supports up to 64K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek: R1 support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5: yes. DeepSeek: R1: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 with other models

Compare DeepSeek: R1 with other models