Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 vs OpenAI: o1 (batch)

Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 is the pick when you need to fit long inputs in one request, OpenAI: o1 (batch) when cost matters at scale.

Key numbers

SpecAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1OpenAI: o1 (batch)
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input price (per 1M tokens)$10.00$7.50
Output price (per 1M tokens)$50.00$30.00
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$20.00$13.13
Cheaper than … of all models we track3%4%
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages)200K tokens (~300 pages)
Larger context than … of all models69%38%
Max output per response128K tokens (~96,000 words)100K tokens (~75,000 words)
Input typestext, image, filetext, image, file
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2026-09-012024-12-17
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1OpenAI: o1 (batch)Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$1,750$1,163OpenAI: o1 (batch) saves $588
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$1,700$1,200OpenAI: o1 (batch) saves $500
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$1,800$1,260OpenAI: o1 (batch) saves $540
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$1,100$780OpenAI: o1 (batch) saves $320
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$550$405OpenAI: o1 (batch) saves $145

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1OpenAI: o1 (batch)What it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input✓ Yes✓ Yesaccept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search✓ Yes✓ Yesanswer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)—✓ Yesrepeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 if…

  • you need to fit long inputs in one request — 1M tokens is roughly 1,500 pages, against 300
  • you want the newer model — released 2026-09-01, 21 months after the other

Choose OpenAI: o1 (batch) if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 34% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($1,163 vs $1,750 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need seed (reproducible sampling) — to repeat a generation for tests and evals; Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 does not advertise it

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 better than OpenAI: o1 (batch)?

Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 is the pick when you need to fit long inputs in one request, OpenAI: o1 (batch) when cost matters at scale. In short: Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 when you need to fit long inputs in one request, you want the newer model; OpenAI: o1 (batch) when cost matters at scale, you need seed (reproducible sampling).

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 or OpenAI: o1 (batch)?

OpenAI: o1 (batch) is cheaper: $13.13 vs $20.00 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 34% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $1,163 against $1,750.

How much do Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and OpenAI: o1 (batch) cost per million tokens?

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output tokens; OpenAI: o1 (batch) costs $7.50 input and $30.00 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 or OpenAI: o1 (batch)?

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1: 1M tokens, about 1,500 pages, against 200K (about 300 pages) for OpenAI: o1 (batch).

Do Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and OpenAI: o1 (batch) support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1: yes, OpenAI: o1 (batch): yes. JSON-schema structured output — Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1: yes, OpenAI: o1 (batch): yes.

Can Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 or OpenAI: o1 (batch) read images?

Yes, both accept image input.

Is Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 or OpenAI: o1 (batch) free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and OpenAI: o1 (batch)?

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 can write up to 128K tokens (about 96,000 words) per response; OpenAI: o1 (batch) up to 100K (about 75,000 words).

When were Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and OpenAI: o1 (batch) released?

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 was listed on 2026-09-01; OpenAI: o1 (batch) on 2024-12-17.

About the two models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 with other models

Compare OpenAI: o1 (batch) with other models

Advertisement