Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 is the pick when you generate long outputs in one go, Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite when cost matters at scale.

Key numbers

SpecAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input price (per 1M tokens)$10.00$0.10
Output price (per 1M tokens)$50.00$0.40
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$20.00$0.18
Cheaper than … of all models we track3%71%
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages)1.0M tokens (~1,573 pages)
Larger context than … of all models69%81%
Max output per response128K tokens (~96,000 words)66K tokens (~49,200 words)
Input typestext, image, filetext, image, file, audio, video
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2026-09-012025-07-22
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteDifference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$1,750$15.50Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite saves $1,735
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$1,700$16.00Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite saves $1,684
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$1,800$16.80Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite saves $1,783
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$1,100$10.40Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite saves $1,090
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$550$5.40Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite saves $545

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteWhat it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input—✓ Yestake speech or audio directly
File / PDF input✓ Yes✓ Yesaccept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search✓ Yes✓ Yesanswer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)—✓ Yesrepeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 if…

  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 128K tokens (about 96,000 words) per response
  • you want the newer model — released 2026-09-01, 14 months after the other

Choose Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 99% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($15.50 vs $1,750 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need audio input — to take speech or audio directly; Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 does not advertise it
  • you need seed (reproducible sampling) — to repeat a generation for tests and evals; Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 does not advertise it

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 better than Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?

Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 is the pick when you generate long outputs in one go, Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite when cost matters at scale. In short: Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 when you generate long outputs in one go, you want the newer model; Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite when cost matters at scale, you need audio input, you need seed (reproducible sampling).

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 or Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is cheaper: $0.18 vs $20.00 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 99% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $15.50 against $1,750.

How much do Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite cost per million tokens?

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output tokens; Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 input and $0.40 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 or Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: 1.0M tokens, about 1,573 pages, against 1M (about 1,500 pages) for Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1.

Do Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1: yes, Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: yes. JSON-schema structured output — Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1: yes, Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: yes.

Can Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 or Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite read images?

Yes, both accept image input.

Is Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 or Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 can write up to 128K tokens (about 96,000 words) per response; Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite up to 66K (about 49,200 words).

When were Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite released?

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 was listed on 2026-09-01; Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on 2025-07-22.

About the two models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 with other models

Compare Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite with other models

Advertisement