Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch)
Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) is the pick when cost matters at scale, OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) when you need seed (reproducible sampling).
Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.
Workload (per month)
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch)
OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch)
Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$875
$1,762
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) saves $887
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$850
$1,500
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) saves $650
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$900
$1,620
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) saves $720
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$550
$960
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) saves $410
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$275
$435
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) saves $160
Capabilities side by side
Capability
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch)
OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch)
What it lets you do
Tool / function calling
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
call your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
return JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
read screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input
—
—
take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output
—
—
generate images, not just text
Built-in web search
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)
—
✓ Yes
repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities
—
—
read token confidence for classification and scoring
From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.
Price history
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch): price unchanged since we started tracking it on 2026-09-03.
OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch): price unchanged since we started tracking it on 2026-08-07.
Which should you choose?
Choose Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) if…
cost matters at scale — it is 52% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($875 vs $1,762 a month for 50,000 support chats)
you need to fit long inputs in one request — 1M tokens is roughly 1,500 pages, against 600
you want the newer model — released 2026-09-01, 11 months after the other
Choose OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) if…
you need seed (reproducible sampling) — to repeat a generation for tests and evals; Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) does not advertise it
Frequently asked questions
Is Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) better than OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch)?
Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) is the pick when cost matters at scale, OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) when you need seed (reproducible sampling). In short: Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) when cost matters at scale, you need to fit long inputs in one request, you want the newer model; OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) when you need seed (reproducible sampling).
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) or OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch)?
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) is cheaper: $10.00 vs $20.63 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 52% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $875 against $1,762.
How much do Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) cost per million tokens?
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) costs $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $25.00 per 1M output tokens; OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) costs $7.50 input and $60.00 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.
Which has the bigger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) or OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch)?
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch): 1M tokens, about 1,500 pages, against 400K (about 600 pages) for OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch).
Do Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) support function calling and JSON output?
Tool calling — Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch): yes, OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch): yes. JSON-schema structured output — Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch): yes, OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch): yes.
Can Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) or OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) read images?
Yes, both accept image input.
Is Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) or OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) free to use?
No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.
What is the maximum output length of Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch)?
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) can write up to 128K tokens (about 96,000 words) per response; OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) up to 128K (about 96,000 words).
When were Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) released?
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) was listed on 2026-09-01; OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (batch) on 2025-10-06.
Claude Fable 5.1 improves on Claude Fable 5 across the board, with the biggest gains in agentic coding, long-running agentic workflows, and knowledge work: long code refactors, front-end and visual...
GPT-5 Pro is OpenAI’s most advanced model, offering major improvements in reasoning, code quality, and user experience. It is optimized for complex tasks that require step-by-step reasoning, instruction following, and...