Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) vs Qwen/Qwen3-4B

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) wins on 6 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)Qwen/Qwen3-4BWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200KUnknown🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$3.00Custom🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$15.00Custom🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) better than Qwen/Qwen3-4B?

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) wins on 6 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) and Qwen/Qwen3-4B?

Input: $3.00 vs Custom per 1M tokens. Output: $15.00 vs Custom per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) and Qwen/Qwen3-4B support?

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) supports up to 200K tokens. Qwen/Qwen3-4B supports up to Unknown tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) and Qwen/Qwen3-4B support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking): yes. Qwen/Qwen3-4B: not advertised.

Compare Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) with other models

Compare Qwen/Qwen3-4B with other models