Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude 3.5 SonnetOpenAI: GPT-4 TurboWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K128K🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$6.00$10.00🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$30.00$30.00Tie
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo?

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo?

Input: $6.00 vs $10.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $30.00 vs $30.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo support?

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports up to 200K tokens. OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo supports up to 128K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet: yes. OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet with other models

Compare OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo with other models