Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout

Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude 3.5 SonnetMeta: Llama 4 ScoutWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K328K🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$6.00$0.08🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$30.00$0.30🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Meta: Llama 4 Scout?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Meta: Llama 4 Scout?

Input: $6.00 vs $0.08 per 1M tokens. Output: $30.00 vs $0.30 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Meta: Llama 4 Scout support?

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports up to 200K tokens. Meta: Llama 4 Scout supports up to 328K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Meta: Llama 4 Scout support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet: yes. Meta: Llama 4 Scout: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet with other models

Compare Meta: Llama 4 Scout with other models