Auto-generated comparison

Magnum v4 72B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMagnum v4 72BQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
33K33KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$2.50$0.66🏆 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$1.00🏆 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Magnum v4 72B better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Magnum v4 72B and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Input: $2.50 vs $0.66 per 1M tokens. Output: $5.00 vs $1.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Magnum v4 72B and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct support?

Magnum v4 72B supports up to 33K tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct supports up to 33K tokens.

Do both Magnum v4 72B and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct support tool calling?

Magnum v4 72B: not advertised. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: not advertised.

Compare Magnum v4 72B with other models

Compare Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct with other models