Auto-generated comparison

Goliath 120B vs Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoliath 120BMeta: Llama 3 70B InstructWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
6K8K🏆 Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$3.75$0.51🏆 Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$7.50$0.74🏆 Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Goliath 120B better than Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct?

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Goliath 120B and Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct?

Input: $3.75 vs $0.51 per 1M tokens. Output: $7.50 vs $0.74 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Goliath 120B and Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct support?

Goliath 120B supports up to 6K tokens. Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct supports up to 8K tokens.

Do both Goliath 120B and Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct support tool calling?

Goliath 120B: not advertised. Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct: not advertised.

Compare Goliath 120B with other models

Compare Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct with other models