Auto-generated comparison

Goliath 120B vs Cohere: Command A

Cohere: Command A wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoliath 120BCohere: Command AWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
6K256K🏆 Cohere: Command A
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$3.75$2.50🏆 Cohere: Command A
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$7.50$10.00🏆 Goliath 120B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Goliath 120B better than Cohere: Command A?

Cohere: Command A wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Goliath 120B and Cohere: Command A?

Input: $3.75 vs $2.50 per 1M tokens. Output: $7.50 vs $10.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Goliath 120B and Cohere: Command A support?

Goliath 120B supports up to 6K tokens. Cohere: Command A supports up to 256K tokens.

Do both Goliath 120B and Cohere: Command A support tool calling?

Goliath 120B: not advertised. Cohere: Command A: not advertised.

Compare Goliath 120B with other models

Compare Cohere: Command A with other models