Auto-generated comparison

Goliath 120B vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoliath 120BAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
6K1M🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$3.75$2.50🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$7.50$12.50🏆 Goliath 120B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)

Frequently asked questions

Is Goliath 120B better than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Goliath 120B and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)?

Input: $3.75 vs $2.50 per 1M tokens. Output: $7.50 vs $12.50 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Goliath 120B and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) support?

Goliath 120B supports up to 6K tokens. Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Goliath 120B and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) support tool calling?

Goliath 120B: not advertised. Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch): yes.

Compare Goliath 120B with other models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) with other models