Provider comparison

~anthropic vs Inclusionai

Comparing model portfolios, pricing, and capabilities across 4+ ~anthropic models and 5+ Inclusionai models.

At a glance

Top 5 cheapest — ~anthropic

ModelContextInput / 1MModality
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest200K$1.0000text+image+file->text
Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest1,000K$2.0000text+image+file->text
Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest1,000K$5.0000text+image+file->text
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest1,000K$10.0000text+image+file->text

Top 5 cheapest — Inclusionai

ModelContextInput / 1MModality
Ling-3.0-flash (free)262.144K$0.0000text->text
inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash262.144K$0.0100text->text
inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T262.144K$0.0750text->text
inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T262.144K$0.0750text->text
Ling-3.0-flash131.072K$0.0750text->text

Frequently asked questions

Which provider has more models — ~anthropic or Inclusionai?

~anthropic has 4 models. Inclusionai has 5 models.

Which is cheaper on average — ~anthropic or Inclusionai?

~anthropic average: $4.50/1M. Inclusionai average: $0.05/1M.

Which provider has more long-context (128K+) models?

~anthropic: 4 models. Inclusionai: 5 models.

How do I compare specific models between ~anthropic and Inclusionai?

Use the ~anthropic and Inclusionai collection pages to browse individual models, then open a pairwise comparison from any model page.

Browse more providers