Scaledown lists 2 models and Thinkingmachines 6. Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model ($0.03 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Scaledown cost compare with Thinkingmachines cost?
Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.22 for Thinkingmachines. The cheapest paid models are ScaleDown: Extract at $0.03 and Thinking Machines: Inkling Small at $0.64.
Is Scaledown better than Thinkingmachines?
It depends on the job: Thinkingmachines offers the broader line-up (2 models vs 6), Scaledown the lower typical price, Thinkingmachines the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Scaledown or Thinkingmachines?
Thinkingmachines: Scaledown lists 2 models and Thinkingmachines lists 6.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Thinkingmachines: Scaledown's longest is ScaleDown: Extract at 1M tokens; Thinkingmachines's is Thinking Machines: Inkling (free) at 1.0M.
Do Scaledown or Thinkingmachines offer free models?