Reflection lists 1 models and Thinkingmachines 6. Thinkingmachines is cheaper on a typical model ($1.22 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Reflection cost compare with Thinkingmachines cost?
Thinkingmachines is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $1.22 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.50 for Reflection. The cheapest paid models are Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at $1.50 and Thinking Machines: Inkling Small at $0.64.
Is Reflection better than Thinkingmachines?
It depends on the job: Thinkingmachines offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 6), Thinkingmachines the lower typical price. The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Reflection or Thinkingmachines?
Thinkingmachines: Reflection lists 1 models and Thinkingmachines lists 6.
Which provider has the longest context window?
It is a tie: Reflection's longest is Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at 1.0M tokens; Thinkingmachines's is Thinking Machines: Inkling (free) at 1.0M.
Do Reflection or Thinkingmachines offer free models?