Reflection lists 1 models and Reka 1. Reka is cheaper on a typical model ($0.10 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Reka is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.50 for Reflection. The cheapest paid models are Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at $1.50 and Reka Edge at $0.10.
Is Reflection better than Reka?
It depends on the job: both list 1 models, Reka the lower typical price, Reflection the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Reflection or Reka?
Neither — both list 1 models.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Reflection: Reflection's longest is Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at 1.0M tokens; Reka's is Reka Edge at 16K.
Do Reflection or Reka offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Reflection: 0 of 1 models accept images. Reka: 1 of 1.