Recursive lists 1 models and Thinkingmachines 6. Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
It depends on the job: Thinkingmachines offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 6), Thinkingmachines the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Recursive or Thinkingmachines?
Thinkingmachines: Recursive lists 1 models and Thinkingmachines lists 6.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Thinkingmachines: Recursive's longest is Recursive: Flint (free) at 262K tokens; Thinkingmachines's is Thinking Machines: Inkling (free) at 1.0M.
Do Recursive or Thinkingmachines offer free models?