Is Recursive better than Sao10k?
It depends on the job: Sao10k offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 5), Recursive the longest context (262K tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Recursive vs Sao10k
Recursive lists 1 models and Sao10k 5. Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
At a glance
| Recursive | Sao10k | |
|---|---|---|
| Models listed | 1 | 5 |
| Models with published pricing | 1 | 5 |
| Typical price (median, 3:1 blend per 1M) | n/a | $0.85 |
| Cheapest paid model | n/a | Sao10K: Llama 3 8B Lunaris ($0.04) |
| Longest context | Recursive: Flint (free) (262K) | Sao10K: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 (131K) |
| Free models | 1 | 0 |
| Newest model | Recursive: Flint (free) (2026-10-21) | Sao10K: Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 (2025-01-08) |
| Price changes in the last 90 days | 0 | 0 |
Advertisement
What each costs for real workloads
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
| Workload (per month) | Recursive | Sao10k |
|---|---|---|
| Customer-support chatbot 50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation | no suitable model | $4.00 with Sao10K: Llama 3 8B Lunaris |
| RAG search over documents 20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages | no suitable model | $5.30 with Sao10K: Llama 3 8B Lunaris |
| Coding / tool-using agent 2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context | no suitable model | no suitable model |
| Batch summarisation 10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page | no suitable model | $56.50 with Sao10K: Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B |
| Long-document analysis 500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass | no suitable model | $33.25 with Sao10K: Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B |
Cheapest model for each capability
| You need | Recursive | Sao10k |
|---|---|---|
| Any model | none listed | Sao10K: Llama 3 8B Lunaris ($0.04) |
| With tool calling | none listed | Sao10k: Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 ($1.48) |
| With image input | none listed | none listed |
| With reasoning mode | none listed | none listed |
| 128K+ context | none listed | Sao10K: Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B ($0.68) |
| 1M+ context | none listed | none listed |
Line-up by type and price tier
| Model type | Recursive | Sao10k |
|---|---|---|
| text->text | 1 | 5 |
| Price per 1M (3:1 blend) | Recursive | Sao10k |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 1 | 0 |
| Under $0.50 | 0 | 1 |
| $0.50 – $3 | 0 | 3 |
| $3 – $10 | 0 | 1 |
| $10 and up | 0 | 0 |
Frequently asked questions
Which has more models, Recursive or Sao10k?
Sao10k: Recursive lists 1 models and Sao10k lists 5.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Recursive: Recursive's longest is Recursive: Flint (free) at 262K tokens; Sao10k's is Sao10K: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 at 131K.
Do Recursive or Sao10k offer free models?
Recursive: 1 free model (e.g. Recursive: Flint (free)). Sao10k: none.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Recursive: 0 of 1 models accept images. Sao10k: 0 of 5.