Is Recursive better than Rekaai?
It depends on the job: Rekaai offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 2), Recursive the longest context (262K tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Recursive lists 1 models and Rekaai 2. Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
| Recursive | Rekaai | |
|---|---|---|
| Models listed | 1 | 2 |
| Models with published pricing | 1 | 2 |
| Typical price (median, 3:1 blend per 1M) | n/a | $0.11 |
| Cheapest paid model | n/a | Reka Edge ($0.10) |
| Longest context | Recursive: Flint (free) (262K) | Reka Flash 3 (66K) |
| Free models | 1 | 0 |
| Newest model | Recursive: Flint (free) (2026-10-21) | Reka Edge (2026-03-20) |
| Price changes in the last 90 days | 0 | 0 |
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
| Workload (per month) | Recursive | Rekaai |
|---|---|---|
| Customer-support chatbot 50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation | no suitable model | $9.50 with Reka Edge |
| RAG search over documents 20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages | no suitable model | $13.00 with Reka Edge |
| Coding / tool-using agent 2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context | no suitable model | no suitable model |
| Batch summarisation 10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page | no suitable model | $8.60 with Reka Edge |
| Long-document analysis 500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass | no suitable model | no suitable model |
| You need | Recursive | Rekaai |
|---|---|---|
| Any model | none listed | Reka Edge ($0.10) |
| With tool calling | none listed | Reka Edge ($0.10) |
| With image input | none listed | Reka Edge ($0.10) |
| With reasoning mode | none listed | Reka Flash 3 ($0.13) |
| 128K+ context | none listed | none listed |
| 1M+ context | none listed | none listed |
| Model type | Recursive | Rekaai |
|---|---|---|
| text+image+video->text | 0 | 1 |
| text->text | 1 | 1 |
| Price per 1M (3:1 blend) | Recursive | Rekaai |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 1 | 0 |
| Under $0.50 | 0 | 2 |
| $0.50 – $3 | 0 | 0 |
| $3 – $10 | 0 | 0 |
| $10 and up | 0 | 0 |
It depends on the job: Rekaai offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 2), Recursive the longest context (262K tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Rekaai: Recursive lists 1 models and Rekaai lists 2.
Recursive: Recursive's longest is Recursive: Flint (free) at 262K tokens; Rekaai's is Reka Flash 3 at 66K.
Recursive: 1 free model (e.g. Recursive: Flint (free)). Rekaai: none.
Recursive: 0 of 1 models accept images. Rekaai: 1 of 2.