Raifle lists 1 models and Scaledown 2. Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model ($0.03 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $4.50 for Raifle. The cheapest paid models are SorcererLM 8x22B at $4.50 and ScaleDown: Extract at $0.03.
Is Raifle better than Scaledown?
It depends on the job: Scaledown offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 2), Scaledown the lower typical price, Scaledown the longest context (1M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Raifle or Scaledown?
Scaledown: Raifle lists 1 models and Scaledown lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Scaledown: Raifle's longest is SorcererLM 8x22B at 16K tokens; Scaledown's is ScaleDown: Extract at 1M.
Do Raifle or Scaledown offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Raifle: 0 of 1 models accept images. Scaledown: 2 of 2.