Qwen lists 72 models and Reflection 1. Qwen is cheaper on a typical model ($0.41 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Qwen is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.41 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.50 for Reflection. The cheapest paid models are Qwen: Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct at $0.04 and Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at $1.50.
Is Qwen better than Reflection?
It depends on the job: Qwen offers the broader line-up (72 models vs 1), Qwen the lower typical price. The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Qwen or Reflection?
Qwen: Qwen lists 72 models and Reflection lists 1.
Which provider has the longest context window?
It is a tie: Qwen's longest is Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at 1.0M tokens; Reflection's is Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at 1.0M.