Openrouter lists 6 models and Scaledown 2. Openrouter is cheaper on a typical model ($-1000000.0000 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Openrouter cost compare with Scaledown cost?
Openrouter is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $-1000000.0000 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.03 for Scaledown. The cheapest paid models are Auto Router at $-1000000.0000 and ScaleDown: Extract at $0.03.
Is Openrouter better than Scaledown?
It depends on the job: Openrouter offers the broader line-up (6 models vs 2), Openrouter the lower typical price, Openrouter the longest context (2M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Openrouter or Scaledown?
Openrouter: Openrouter lists 6 models and Scaledown lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Openrouter: Openrouter's longest is Auto Router at 2M tokens; Scaledown's is ScaleDown: Extract at 1M.
Do Openrouter or Scaledown offer free models?
Openrouter: 1 free model (e.g. Free Models Router). Scaledown: none.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Openrouter: 3 of 6 models accept images. Scaledown: 2 of 2.