Moondream lists 2 models and Undi95 1. Undi95 is cheaper on a typical model ($0.42 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Undi95 is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.42 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.85 for Moondream. The cheapest paid models are Moondream: Moondream 3 Preview at $0.85 and ReMM SLERP 13B at $0.42.
Is Moondream better than Undi95?
It depends on the job: Moondream offers the broader line-up (2 models vs 1), Undi95 the lower typical price, Moondream the longest context (32K tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Moondream or Undi95?
Moondream: Moondream lists 2 models and Undi95 lists 1.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Moondream: Moondream's longest is Moondream: Moondream 3 Preview at 32K tokens; Undi95's is ReMM SLERP 13B at 6K.
Do Moondream or Undi95 offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Moondream: 2 of 2 models accept images. Undi95: 0 of 1.