Meta vs Scaledown

Meta lists 8 models and Scaledown 2. Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model ($0.03 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.

At a glance

MetaScaledown
Models listed82
Models with published pricing82
Typical price (median, 3:1 blend per 1M)$1.26$0.03
Cheapest paid modelMeta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.13)ScaleDown: Extract ($0.03)
Longest contextMeta: Muse Spark 1.1 (1.0M)ScaleDown: Extract (1M)
Free models00
Newest modelMeta: Muse Wonder (2026-10-12)ScaleDown: Extract (2026-10-13)
Price changes in the last 90 days110

What each costs for real workloads

For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.

Workload (per month)MetaScaledown
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation
$11.50 with Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor$3.00 with ScaleDown: Extract
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages
$14.00 with Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor$4.80 with ScaleDown: Extract
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context
$14.40 with Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributorno suitable model
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page
$9.20 with Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor$3.20 with ScaleDown: Extract
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass
$5.20 with Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor$2.00 with ScaleDown: Extract

Cheapest model for each capability

You needMetaScaledown
Any modelMeta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.13)ScaleDown: Extract ($0.03)
With tool callingMeta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.13)none listed
With image inputMeta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.13)ScaleDown: Extract ($0.03)
With reasoning modeMeta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.13)none listed
128K+ contextMeta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.13)ScaleDown: Extract ($0.03)
1M+ contextMeta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.13)ScaleDown: Extract ($0.03)

Line-up by type and price tier

Model typeMetaScaledown
text+image+file+audio+video->text10
text+image+file+video->text50
text+image+file->text02
text+image->text20
Price per 1M (3:1 blend)MetaScaledown
Free00
Under $0.5032
$0.50 – $340
$3 – $1010
$10 and up00

Frequently asked questions

How does Meta cost compare with Scaledown cost?

Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.26 for Meta. The cheapest paid models are Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor at $0.13 and ScaleDown: Extract at $0.03.

Is Meta better than Scaledown?

It depends on the job: Meta offers the broader line-up (8 models vs 2), Scaledown the lower typical price, Meta the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.

Which has more models, Meta or Scaledown?

Meta: Meta lists 8 models and Scaledown lists 2.

Which provider has the longest context window?

Meta: Meta's longest is Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 at 1.0M tokens; Scaledown's is ScaleDown: Extract at 1M.

Do Meta or Scaledown offer free models?

Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.

Which provider has models that can read images?

Meta: 8 of 8 models accept images. Scaledown: 2 of 2.

Browse more providers

Advertisement