Meta lists 9 models and Reflection 1. Reflection is cheaper on a typical model ($1.50 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Reflection is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $1.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $2.00 for Meta. The cheapest paid models are Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor at $0.13 and Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at $1.50.
Is Meta better than Reflection?
It depends on the job: Meta offers the broader line-up (9 models vs 1), Reflection the lower typical price. The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Meta or Reflection?
Meta: Meta lists 9 models and Reflection lists 1.
Which provider has the longest context window?
It is a tie: Meta's longest is Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 at 1.0M tokens; Reflection's is Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at 1.0M.
Do Meta or Reflection offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Meta: 9 of 9 models accept images. Reflection: 0 of 1.