Meta lists 16 models and Scaledown 2. Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model ($0.03 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.23 for Meta. The cheapest paid models are Llama Guard 3 8B at $0.03 and ScaleDown: Extract at $0.03.
Is Meta better than Scaledown?
It depends on the job: Meta offers the broader line-up (16 models vs 2), Scaledown the lower typical price, Meta the longest context (1.3M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Meta or Scaledown?
Meta: Meta lists 16 models and Scaledown lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Meta: Meta's longest is Meta: Llama 4 Scout at 1.3M tokens; Scaledown's is ScaleDown: Extract at 1M.