Meta lists 16 models and Reflection 1. Meta is cheaper on a typical model ($0.15 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Meta is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.50 for Reflection. The cheapest paid models are Llama Guard 3 8B at $0.03 and Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at $1.50.
Is Meta better than Reflection?
It depends on the job: Meta offers the broader line-up (16 models vs 1), Meta the lower typical price, Meta the longest context (1.3M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Meta or Reflection?
Meta: Meta lists 16 models and Reflection lists 1.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Meta: Meta's longest is Meta: Llama 4 Scout at 1.3M tokens; Reflection's is Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at 1.0M.