Meta lists 16 models and Moondream 2. Meta is cheaper on a typical model ($0.23 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Meta is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.23 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.85 for Moondream. The cheapest paid models are Llama Guard 3 8B at $0.03 and Moondream: Moondream 3 Preview at $0.85.
Is Meta better than Moondream?
It depends on the job: Meta offers the broader line-up (16 models vs 2), Meta the lower typical price, Meta the longest context (1.3M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Meta or Moondream?
Meta: Meta lists 16 models and Moondream lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Meta: Meta's longest is Meta: Llama 4 Scout at 1.3M tokens; Moondream's is Moondream: Moondream 3 Preview at 32K.