Inference.net lists 2 models and Undi95 1. Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model ($0.08 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Inference.net cost compare with Undi95 cost?
Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.42 for Undi95. The cheapest paid models are Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo at $0.06 and ReMM SLERP 13B at $0.42.
Is Inference.net better than Undi95?
It depends on the job: Inference.net offers the broader line-up (2 models vs 1), Inference.net the lower typical price, Inference.net the longest context (128K tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Inference.net or Undi95?
Inference.net: Inference.net lists 2 models and Undi95 lists 1.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Inference.net: Inference.net's longest is Inference.net: Schematron V2 Small at 128K tokens; Undi95's is ReMM SLERP 13B at 6K.
Do Inference.net or Undi95 offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Inference.net: 0 of 2 models accept images. Undi95: 0 of 1.