Inference.net lists 2 models and Tencent 7. Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model ($0.08 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Inference.net cost compare with Tencent cost?
Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.23 for Tencent. The cheapest paid models are Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo at $0.06 and Tencent: Hy-MT2-1.8B at $0.08.
Is Inference.net better than Tencent?
It depends on the job: Tencent offers the broader line-up (2 models vs 7), Inference.net the lower typical price, Tencent the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Inference.net or Tencent?
Tencent: Inference.net lists 2 models and Tencent lists 7.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Tencent: Inference.net's longest is Inference.net: Schematron V2 Small at 128K tokens; Tencent's is Tencent: Hy4 preview at 1.0M.
Do Inference.net or Tencent offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Inference.net: 0 of 2 models accept images. Tencent: 0 of 7.