Inference.net lists 2 models and Relace 2. Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model ($0.08 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Inference.net cost compare with Relace cost?
Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.23 for Relace. The cheapest paid models are Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo at $0.06 and Relace: Relace Apply 3 at $0.95.
Is Inference.net better than Relace?
It depends on the job: both list 2 models, Inference.net the lower typical price, Relace the longest context (256K tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Inference.net or Relace?
Neither — both list 2 models.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Relace: Inference.net's longest is Inference.net: Schematron V2 Small at 128K tokens; Relace's is Relace: Relace Apply 3 at 256K.
Do Inference.net or Relace offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Inference.net: 0 of 2 models accept images. Relace: 0 of 2.