Inference.net lists 2 models and NVIDIA 22. Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model ($0.08 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Inference.net cost compare with NVIDIA cost?
Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.24 for NVIDIA. The cheapest paid models are Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo at $0.06 and NVIDIA: Switchyard at $-1000000.0000.
Is Inference.net better than NVIDIA?
It depends on the job: NVIDIA offers the broader line-up (2 models vs 22), Inference.net the lower typical price, NVIDIA the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Inference.net or NVIDIA?
NVIDIA: Inference.net lists 2 models and NVIDIA lists 22.
Which provider has the longest context window?
NVIDIA: Inference.net's longest is Inference.net: Schematron V2 Small at 128K tokens; NVIDIA's is NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL at 1.0M.