Inference.net lists 2 models and Microsoft 2. Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model ($0.08 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Inference.net cost compare with Microsoft cost?
Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.35 for Microsoft. The cheapest paid models are Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo at $0.06 and Microsoft: Phi 4 at $0.09.
Is Inference.net better than Microsoft?
It depends on the job: both list 2 models, Inference.net the lower typical price, Inference.net the longest context (128K tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Inference.net or Microsoft?
Neither — both list 2 models.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Inference.net: Inference.net's longest is Inference.net: Schematron V2 Small at 128K tokens; Microsoft's is WizardLM-2 8x22B at 66K.
Do Inference.net or Microsoft offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Inference.net: 0 of 2 models accept images. Microsoft: 0 of 2.