Inference.net vs Meta

Inference.net lists 2 models and Meta 16. Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model ($0.08 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.

At a glance

Inference.netMeta
Models listed216
Models with published pricing216
Typical price (median, 3:1 blend per 1M)$0.08$0.15
Cheapest paid modelInference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo ($0.06)Llama Guard 3 8B ($0.03)
Longest contextInference.net: Schematron V2 Small (128K)Meta: Llama 4 Scout (1.3M)
Free models02
Newest modelInference.net: Schematron V2 Small (2026-09-12)Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B (2025-04-30)
Price changes in the last 90 days030
Advertisement

What each costs for real workloads

For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.

Workload (per month)Inference.netMeta
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation
$5.25 with Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo$2.70 with Llama Guard 3 8B
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages
$5.10 with Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo$3.00 with Llama Guard 3 8B
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context
no suitable model$6.96 with meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page
$3.30 with Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo$1.96 with Llama Guard 3 8B
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass
$1.65 with Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo$1.06 with Llama Guard 3 8B

Cheapest model for each capability

You needInference.netMeta
Any modelInference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo ($0.06)Llama Guard 3 8B ($0.03)
With tool callingnone listedMeta: Llama 3 8B Instruct ($0.03)
With image inputnone listedMeta: Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct ($0.05)
With reasoning modenone listednone listed
128K+ contextInference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo ($0.06)Llama Guard 3 8B ($0.03)
1M+ contextnone listedMeta: Llama 4 Scout ($0.15)

Line-up by type and price tier

Model typeInference.netMeta
text+image->text04
text->text212
Price per 1M (3:1 blend)Inference.netMeta
Free02
Under $0.50211
$0.50 – $301
$3 – $1002
$10 and up00

Frequently asked questions

How does Inference.net cost compare with Meta cost?

Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.15 for Meta. The cheapest paid models are Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo at $0.06 and Llama Guard 3 8B at $0.03.

Is Inference.net better than Meta?

It depends on the job: Meta offers the broader line-up (2 models vs 16), Inference.net the lower typical price, Meta the longest context (1.3M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.

Which has more models, Inference.net or Meta?

Meta: Inference.net lists 2 models and Meta lists 16.

Which provider has the longest context window?

Meta: Inference.net's longest is Inference.net: Schematron V2 Small at 128K tokens; Meta's is Meta: Llama 4 Scout at 1.3M.

Do Inference.net or Meta offer free models?

Inference.net: none. Meta: 2 free models (e.g. Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free)).

Which provider has models that can read images?

Inference.net: 0 of 2 models accept images. Meta: 4 of 16.

Browse more providers

Advertisement