Inception lists 5 models and Reflection 1. Inception is cheaper on a typical model ($0.38 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Inception cost compare with Reflection cost?
Inception is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.50 for Reflection. The cheapest paid models are Inception: Mercury 2.5 at $0.07 and Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at $1.50.
Is Inception better than Reflection?
It depends on the job: Inception offers the broader line-up (5 models vs 1), Inception the lower typical price, Reflection the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Inception or Reflection?
Inception: Inception lists 5 models and Reflection lists 1.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Reflection: Inception's longest is Inception: Mercury 2.5 at 260K tokens; Reflection's is Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at 1.0M.
Do Inception or Reflection offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Inception: 0 of 5 models accept images. Reflection: 0 of 1.