Inception vs Reflection

Inception lists 5 models and Reflection 1. Inception is cheaper on a typical model ($0.38 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.

At a glance

InceptionReflection
Models listed51
Models with published pricing51
Typical price (median, 3:1 blend per 1M)$0.38$1.50
Cheapest paid modelInception: Mercury 2.5 ($0.07)Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B ($1.50)
Longest contextInception: Mercury 2.5 (260K)Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B (1.0M)
Free models00
Newest modelInception: Mercury 2.5 (2026-09-08)Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B (2026-10-16)
Price changes in the last 90 days00

What each costs for real workloads

For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.

Workload (per month)InceptionReflection
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation
$6.00 with Inception: Mercury 2.5$135 with Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages
$6.30 with Inception: Mercury 2.5$150 with Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context
$6.60 with Inception: Mercury 2.5$156 with Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page
$4.10 with Inception: Mercury 2.5$98.00 with Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass
$2.15 with Inception: Mercury 2.5$53.00 with Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Cheapest model for each capability

You needInceptionReflection
Any modelInception: Mercury 2.5 ($0.07)Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B ($1.50)
With tool callingInception: Mercury 2.5 ($0.07)Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B ($1.50)
With image inputnone listednone listed
With reasoning modeInception: Mercury 2.5 ($0.07)Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B ($1.50)
128K+ contextInception: Mercury 2.5 ($0.07)Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B ($1.50)
1M+ contextnone listedReflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B ($1.50)

Line-up by type and price tier

Model typeInceptionReflection
text->text51
Price per 1M (3:1 blend)InceptionReflection
Free00
Under $0.5050
$0.50 – $301
$3 – $1000
$10 and up00

Frequently asked questions

How does Inception cost compare with Reflection cost?

Inception is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.50 for Reflection. The cheapest paid models are Inception: Mercury 2.5 at $0.07 and Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at $1.50.

Is Inception better than Reflection?

It depends on the job: Inception offers the broader line-up (5 models vs 1), Inception the lower typical price, Reflection the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.

Which has more models, Inception or Reflection?

Inception: Inception lists 5 models and Reflection lists 1.

Which provider has the longest context window?

Reflection: Inception's longest is Inception: Mercury 2.5 at 260K tokens; Reflection's is Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at 1.0M.

Do Inception or Reflection offer free models?

Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.

Which provider has models that can read images?

Inception: 0 of 5 models accept images. Reflection: 0 of 1.

Browse more providers

Advertisement