Google lists 58 models and Reflection 1. Google is cheaper on a typical model ($0.80 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Google cost compare with Reflection cost?
Google is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.50 for Reflection. The cheapest paid models are Google: Gemma 2 9B at $0.04 and Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at $1.50.
Is Google better than Reflection?
It depends on the job: Google offers the broader line-up (58 models vs 1), Google the lower typical price. The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Google or Reflection?
Google: Google lists 58 models and Reflection lists 1.
Which provider has the longest context window?
It is a tie: Google's longest is Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash at 1.0M tokens; Reflection's is Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B at 1.0M.