Google lists 58 models and Moondream 2. Google is cheaper on a typical model ($0.80 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Google is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.85 for Moondream. The cheapest paid models are Google: Gemma 2 9B at $0.04 and Moondream: Moondream 3 Preview at $0.85.
Is Google better than Moondream?
It depends on the job: Google offers the broader line-up (58 models vs 2), Google the lower typical price, Google the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Google or Moondream?
Google: Google lists 58 models and Moondream lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Google: Google's longest is Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash at 1.0M tokens; Moondream's is Moondream: Moondream 3 Preview at 32K.