Fireworks lists 1 models and Scaledown 2. Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model ($0.03 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Fireworks cost compare with Scaledown cost?
Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $6.00 for Fireworks. The cheapest paid models are Fireworks: Ember-1 at $6.00 and ScaleDown: Extract at $0.03.
Is Fireworks better than Scaledown?
It depends on the job: Scaledown offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 2), Scaledown the lower typical price, Fireworks the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Fireworks or Scaledown?
Scaledown: Fireworks lists 1 models and Scaledown lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Fireworks: Fireworks's longest is Fireworks: Ember-1 at 1.0M tokens; Scaledown's is ScaleDown: Extract at 1M.
Do Fireworks or Scaledown offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Fireworks: 1 of 1 models accept images. Scaledown: 2 of 2.