How does Elorian cost compare with Undi95 cost?
Undi95 is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.42 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.20 for Elorian. The cheapest paid models are Elorian: Glimpse at $1.20 and ReMM SLERP 13B at $0.42.
Elorian vs Undi95
Elorian lists 1 models and Undi95 1. Undi95 is cheaper on a typical model ($0.42 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
At a glance
| Elorian | Undi95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Models listed | 1 | 1 |
| Models with published pricing | 1 | 1 |
| Typical price (median, 3:1 blend per 1M) | $1.20 | $0.42 |
| Cheapest paid model | Elorian: Glimpse ($1.20) | ReMM SLERP 13B ($0.42) |
| Longest context | Elorian: Glimpse (262K) | ReMM SLERP 13B (6K) |
| Free models | 0 | 0 |
| Newest model | Elorian: Glimpse (2026-10-17) | ReMM SLERP 13B (2023-07-22) |
| Price changes in the last 90 days | 0 | 1 |
Advertisement
What each costs for real workloads
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
| Workload (per month) | Elorian | Undi95 |
|---|---|---|
| Customer-support chatbot 50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation | $105 with Elorian: Glimpse | $39.25 with ReMM SLERP 13B |
| RAG search over documents 20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages | $102 with Elorian: Glimpse | no suitable model |
| Coding / tool-using agent 2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context | $108 with Elorian: Glimpse | no suitable model |
| Batch summarisation 10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page | $66.00 with Elorian: Glimpse | no suitable model |
| Long-document analysis 500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass | $33.00 with Elorian: Glimpse | no suitable model |
Cheapest model for each capability
| You need | Elorian | Undi95 |
|---|---|---|
| Any model | Elorian: Glimpse ($1.20) | ReMM SLERP 13B ($0.42) |
| With tool calling | Elorian: Glimpse ($1.20) | none listed |
| With image input | Elorian: Glimpse ($1.20) | none listed |
| With reasoning mode | Elorian: Glimpse ($1.20) | none listed |
| 128K+ context | Elorian: Glimpse ($1.20) | none listed |
| 1M+ context | none listed | none listed |
Line-up by type and price tier
| Model type | Elorian | Undi95 |
|---|---|---|
| text+image+video->text | 1 | 0 |
| text->text | 0 | 1 |
| Price per 1M (3:1 blend) | Elorian | Undi95 |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 0 | 0 |
| Under $0.50 | 0 | 1 |
| $0.50 – $3 | 1 | 0 |
| $3 – $10 | 0 | 0 |
| $10 and up | 0 | 0 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Elorian better than Undi95?
It depends on the job: both list 1 models, Undi95 the lower typical price, Elorian the longest context (262K tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Elorian or Undi95?
Neither — both list 1 models.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Elorian: Elorian's longest is Elorian: Glimpse at 262K tokens; Undi95's is ReMM SLERP 13B at 6K.
Do Elorian or Undi95 offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Elorian: 1 of 1 models accept images. Undi95: 0 of 1.