Elorian lists 1 models and Tencent 7. Tencent is cheaper on a typical model ($0.23 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Tencent is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.23 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.20 for Elorian. The cheapest paid models are Elorian: Glimpse at $1.20 and Tencent: Hy-MT2-1.8B at $0.08.
Is Elorian better than Tencent?
It depends on the job: Tencent offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 7), Tencent the lower typical price, Tencent the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Elorian or Tencent?
Tencent: Elorian lists 1 models and Tencent lists 7.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Tencent: Elorian's longest is Elorian: Glimpse at 262K tokens; Tencent's is Tencent: Hy4 preview at 1.0M.
Do Elorian or Tencent offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Elorian: 1 of 1 models accept images. Tencent: 0 of 7.