Elorian lists 1 models and Inclusionai 13. Inclusionai is cheaper on a typical model ($0.08 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Elorian cost compare with Inclusionai cost?
Inclusionai is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.20 for Elorian. The cheapest paid models are Elorian: Glimpse at $1.20 and inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash at $0.01.
Is Elorian better than Inclusionai?
It depends on the job: Inclusionai offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 13), Inclusionai the lower typical price. The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Elorian or Inclusionai?
Inclusionai: Elorian lists 1 models and Inclusionai lists 13.
Which provider has the longest context window?
It is a tie: Elorian's longest is Elorian: Glimpse at 262K tokens; Inclusionai's is inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash at 262K.