Elorian lists 1 models and Inception 5. Inception is cheaper on a typical model ($0.38 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Elorian cost compare with Inception cost?
Inception is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.20 for Elorian. The cheapest paid models are Elorian: Glimpse at $1.20 and Inception: Mercury 2.5 at $0.07.
Is Elorian better than Inception?
It depends on the job: Inception offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 5), Inception the lower typical price, Elorian the longest context (262K tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Elorian or Inception?
Inception: Elorian lists 1 models and Inception lists 5.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Elorian: Elorian's longest is Elorian: Glimpse at 262K tokens; Inception's is Inception: Mercury 2.5 at 260K.
Do Elorian or Inception offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Elorian: 1 of 1 models accept images. Inception: 0 of 5.