Elorian lists 1 models and Google 58. Google is cheaper on a typical model ($0.80 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Google is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.20 for Elorian. The cheapest paid models are Elorian: Glimpse at $1.20 and Google: Gemma 2 9B at $0.04.
Is Elorian better than Google?
It depends on the job: Google offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 58), Google the lower typical price, Google the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Elorian or Google?
Google: Elorian lists 1 models and Google lists 58.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Google: Elorian's longest is Elorian: Glimpse at 262K tokens; Google's is Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash at 1.0M.